Poster: Gothic at 12/8/2005 4:26:21 PM PST
Subject: So T in your meeting today...... |
| |
Did you bring up with the dev's how unhappy the warrior community as a whole is with the New Wrath look?
http://wow.allakhazam.com/profile.html?258657
|
| | http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-warrior&t=656631&p=#post656631 |
| |
Poster: Tseric at 12/8/2005 6:23:55 PM PST
Subject: Re: So T in your meeting today...... |
| |
Design like that is a purely subjective realm and can be quite fruitless when arguing matters of taste or preference. Personally, I was more concerned with the set-bonuses. We brought up your considerations for gearing the bonuses more towards tanking. It is being mulled over and I remain optimistic ;)
WTT [Opinion] PST
|
| | http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-warrior&t=656631&p=#post657012 |
Poster: Tseric at 12/8/2005 6:51:37 PM PST
Subject: Re: So T in your meeting today...... |
| |
Q u o t e:
Any news on the Enrage nerf, Tseric? I still maintain that this hurts fury warriors and non-epic geared warriors than the "problem" types.
Actually, the Enrage nerf was put into context with the Bloodthirst buff. The intent of the enrage nerf was to smooth out excessive damage in group PvP where players were using it continuously. Obviously some of these players were MS spec'ed as well and were reaping the most benefit from the current set-up. However, with the enrage nerf comes the bloodthirst buff which maintains potential DPS within the fury tree, while cutting down on the damage from MS warriors. So while a particular ability in the fury tree is being affected, the devs wanted to keep the potential damage within the fury tree by moving it to another talent.[ post edited by Tseric ]
WTT [Opinion] PST
|
| | http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-warrior&t=656631&p=#post657071 |
